Unlike first-person survival horror games that emphasize combat or scripted events, Juniper strips away traditional objectives. Instead, players are thrust into a passive role of exploration and endurance. The added farming mechanics (e.g., planting seeds, harvesting crops) introduce a deceptive sense of control, only to undermine it through random events—such as the sudden appearance of spectral farmhands or collapsing terrain. This design reflects the "surveillance and evasion" model theorized by scholars like Thomas Lamarre, where agency is defined by the tension between action and inaction.
Finally, ensure the paper is well-structured, with clear sections, and that each part builds on the previous one. Avoid overly technical jargon but maintain an academic tone. Maybe use examples from the modding community, like how other mods have altered narratives or gameplay through patches. backroomcastingcouch 24 08 12 juniper the farm patched
I should also consider the implications of mods. How do patches affect the intended narrative? What does the modding community contribute? Are there issues with modders versus copyright? Maybe ethical considerations in modifying horror experiences that mimic real trauma or sensitive topics. This design reflects the "surveillance and evasion" model